Apple doubles down on battle with Qualcomm thanks to recent Supreme Court ruling


One of the major courtroom fights in Silicon Valley flared up again Tuesday, as Apple alleged “mounting evidence” in opposition to chip maker Qualcomm’s royalty payment technique partly due to a latest Supreme Courtroom ruling.

The authorized battle facilities all-around Apple’s obligation to fork out Qualcomm royalties for every single wireless machine that contains the company’s chip technologies. Apple’s new promises, filed on Tuesday in San Diego, request to overthrow Qualcomm’s full business model as “illegal.” Apple argues that Qualcomm is unfairly charging prices for patents and even demanding invalid license royalties.

In the declare, Apple referred to as the invalid royalties “double-dipping” and demanded restitution for all the excessive it had to fork out.

Apple’s a hundred and sixty-page filing mainly facilities on a Supreme Courtroom ruling on patents from past month. In Could, the higher courtroom found that patent regulation cannot prevent the resale of Lexmark printer cartridges refilled with toner by 3rd-get together suppliers, curbing the ability of patent homeowners about marketed merchandise.

Citing the Lexmark determination, Apple argues that after a purchaser purchases a cell phone with Qualcomm technologies the chip maker is currently paid out, and any further royalties charged is a double-dip and a violation of U.S. patent regulation.

The acrimonious divorce among Apple and its longtime chip provider has come a extensive way. The battle initially began with Apple suing in January for $1 billion, accusing Qualcomm of withholding payments in retaliation for Apple cooperating with South Korean regulators in opposition to the chip maker.

Qualcomm countersued in April, declaring the Cupertino tech giant has breached contracts and misrepresented information. Apple has requested its other suppliers all-around the world to prevent having to pay the San Diego-dependent enterprise.

On Tuesday, Apple aimed straight for the jugular by likely following Qualcomm’s royalty-dependent business plan. Apple argues that whilst Qualcomm’s job in aiding make much better transmission of knowledge and cell phone phone calls is undeniable, the modern day smartphone goes outside of that in its capabilities.

In the filing, Apple also questioned the courtroom to invalidate a lot of Qualcomm patents deemed “essential” to the 3G and 4G specifications.


Photograph: The Apple symbol is seen in this September 11, 2012 file photo at the Yerba Buena Middle for Arts in San Francisco.  (AFP/Getty Visuals)


Tags: Apple, Qualcomm